|
A |
Excluding
employment opportunities, what factors motivate people to move to Newaygo
County? [Why Newaygo County over other locations?] |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Small
town (rural) atmosphere, but close to urban centers (Grand Rapids) |
62 |
|
2 |
Natural
features in general |
54 |
|
3 |
Muskegon
River (aesthetic beauty, fishing, etc.) |
46 |
|
4 |
Lakes
(aesthetic beauty, boating, fishing, etc.) |
31 |
|
5 |
Quality
of life |
31 |
|
B |
Excluding
employment opportunities, what factors motivate people to move specifically
to Brooks Township? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Small
town (rural) atmosphere |
62 |
|
2 |
Proximity
of Township (M-82 and M-37) to Grand Rapids |
54 |
|
3 |
Lakes
(aesthetic beauty, fishing, etc.) |
31 |
|
4 |
Muskegon
River (aesthetic beauty, fishing, etc.) |
31 |
|
5 |
Conversion
of cottages to year round use |
23 |
|
C |
Should
industrial development be encouraged in Newaygo City/Brooks Township? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Both the
City and Township in planned industrial parks |
31 |
|
2 |
In the
City of Newaygo |
31 |
|
3 |
Do not
encourage industrial development |
15 |
|
4 |
We have
little/limited control over this matter |
15 |
Notes: a) Virtually all
parties supporting industrial development indicated a desire/need to limit said
development to “clean” industries (the Donnelly facility was mentioned as an
example of a clean industry)
b) Of those supporting industrial
development, the benefits of employment and tax revenue were stated as the
primary reasons for encouraging industry.
|
D |
Should
growth be encouraged along/near the shoreline areas of the Township’s system
of rivers and lakes? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Growth is
inevitable |
62 |
|
2 |
Yes, but
highly controlled (e.g. larger lots to encourage low density and open space) |
15 |
|
3 |
No |
15 |
|
4 |
Most
waterfront properties are already developed |
15 |
|
E |
If
growth is permitted to occur along the Township’s system of rivers and lakes,
should there be development restrictions of some type? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Growth
should be planned for and managed (e.g. through master planning and zoning) |
46 |
|
2 |
Institute
open space requirements |
23 |
|
3 |
Balance
restrictions with education of the public on matters of protection and
preservation |
23 |
|
4 |
Growth is
inevitable - restrictions will not prevent it |
15 |
|
F |
Is the
commercial growth near the M-37/M-82 Intersection replacing Newaygo’s core
(valley) downtown as the City’s prime commercial area? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
a |
Yes |
62 |
|
b |
No, each
commercial area has a different function |
23 |
G |
How
should the City’s core (valley) commercial area be treated in the future |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
The
commercial potential of the downtown is limited, however, building and
infrastructure should be maintained |
38 |
|
2 |
Restore
to an historic character |
23 |
|
3 |
Design as
a pedestrian oriented downtown with speciality shops and linkage to the river |
23 |
|
4 |
Demolish
existing buildings and start over |
23 |
|
H |
Brooks
Township has access/visibility to both M-37 and M-82. Should the Township develop its own
commercial center, potentially competing with commercial development in the
City of Newaygo, or should the Township recognize the City of Newaygo as the
area’s commercial center? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Recognize
the City as the area’s central commercial location |
62 |
|
2 |
Permit
commercial development consistent (compatible) with that occurring in the
City |
31 |
|
I |
Should
M-37 be replaced (or supplemented) by a freeway similar to US-131
and US-31? If not, should any
improvements be made to the existing M-37? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
No,
however, M-37 should be improved (e.g. passing lanes, remove curves, etc.) |
69 |
|
2 |
In the
future - as traffic needs warrant |
15 |
|
J |
If
Brooks Township pursues construction of sanitary sewers around Hess and
Brooks Lakes, and perhaps other high density population areas, should a
Township system be constructed or should the Township tie-in to the system
owned by the City of Newaygo? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Newaygo,
Garfield Township, and Brooks Township should form a regional sanitary sewer
authority for purposes of serving the area |
62 |
|
2 |
Township
should tie-in to City of Newaygo system |
23 |
|
3 |
No
preference as long as the users pay the cost |
15 |
|
K |
Should
Brooks Township pursue the acquisition of river front lands and lands
possessing important natural features for purposes of preservation? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Yes |
54 |
|
2 |
Yes, but
also have others (e.g. State/Federal Government, nature Conservancy, etc.)
purchase such lands |
31 |
|
3 |
Generally,
no. The Township has other funding
needs (e.g. roads, sewers, etc.) |
15 |
|
L |
If the
City of Newaygo needed land in the Township to accommodate new commercial or
industrial growth, should the Township allow the City to annex lands for such
uses? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Instead
of annexation, use intergovernmental tax sharing agreements |
46 |
|
2 |
Yes |
38 |
|
3 |
No |
15 |
M |
Should
Brooks Township allow single-wide mobile homes to be placed in any
residential location (district)? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
No |
62 |
|
2 |
No, but
provisions should be made for affordable housing |
15 |
|
3 |
Yes, but
highly restricted (e.g. rural locations, on large lots, with large setbacks,
etc) |
15 |
|
N |
Should
Brooks Township allow mobile (manufactured) home parks? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Yes, in
planned locations |
78 |
|
2 |
Cannot
prohibit |
15 |
|
O |
What
are the most pressing issues facing the Brooks Township Planning Commission? |
Percent of Persons Responding |
|
1 |
Maintaining
open space |
38 |
|
2 |
Preventing
sprawl |
38 |
|
3 |
Protecting
the Township’s unique natural features |
31 |
|
4 |
Clean-up
of junk and trash |
31 |
|
5 |
Traffic
congestion/traffic impacts |
31 |
|
6 |
Ground
water contamination |
31 |
|
7 |
Overuse
and abuse of state and federal lands and lakes and rivers by tourists and
others |
23 |
|
8 |
Loss of
the Township’s rural character |
23 |
Brooks
Township Citizen Input Survey Responses
PUBLIC
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
|
# |
Yes % |
No % |
Question |
|
1 |
30 |
70 |
Should a freeway be constructed
through Newaygo County? |
|
2 |
95 |
5 |
Should public sanitary sewers
be constructed around Hess and Brooks Lakes? |
|
3 |
86 |
14 |
Should Brooks Township purchase
land along the Muskegon River for purposes of preservation? |
|
4 |
52 |
48 |
Should Brooks Township provide
a location (an area) for industrial development? |
|
5 |
29 |
71 |
Should M-82 be widened to 4
lanes? |
|
6 |
32 |
68 |
Should Brooks Township
encourage a large retailer such as Meijer, K-Mart, and/or WalMart to locate
in the township on M-82 or M-37? |
|
7 |
65 |
35 |
Should M-37 be widened to 4 lanes? |
|
8 |
18 |
82 |
Should most of the lots/parcels with frontage on M-82 (in
the township) be zoned for commercial development? |
|
9 |
65 |
35 |
Should Brooks Township prevent commercial development
along Croton Drive? |
|
10 |
18 |
82 |
As long as they are in planned and landscaped settings,
should Brooks Township permit mobile home parks to be located throughout the
township? |
|
11 |
33 |
67 |
Should Brooks Township permit the City of Newaygo to annex
township land if needed for new commercial or industrial development? |
|
12 |
43 |
57 |
Should all township roads be paved? |
|
13 |
32 |
68 |
Should Brooks Township try to slow its population growth? |
|
14 |
48 |
52 |
Are residential lots ranging in size from 1 to 2 acres
large enough to preserve the township’s rural character? |
|
15 |
88 |
12 |
Would you support stringent zoning regulations along the
township’s rivers and streams in order to limit development? |
|
16 |
50 |
50 |
In 20 years, do you believe the township will be described
as rural in character? |
|
17 |
92 |
8 |
Should local tax dollars be used to educate township
residents on ways to protect the natural environment? |
|
18 |
96 |
4 |
Should the township establish a solid waste recycling
program? |
|
|
|||
|
|
Denotes a response rate of at least 65%. |
||